20, July 2026

The Indian National Congress and the Capitalist Class: A Symbiotic Alliance or Comprador Capitalism?

Author(s): Neeraj Singh

Authors Affiliations:

M.A.History(2026)

Department of History University of Delhi

DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202607009     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202607009


Abstract
Keywords
Cite this Article/Paper as
References

This paper investigates the complex and calculated collaboration between the Indian National Congress (INC) and the home-based capitalist class during the anti-colonial era in India. Rejecting the notion of the comprador bourgeoisie, which proposes that indigenous capitalists were simply imperialist collaborators, it maintains that the Indian capitalist class arrived at the state of national bourgeoisie as a self-sufficient group. They viewed British imperialism with structural antagonism because of their diverging economic interests on issues of tariffs, exchange rates, and foreign investment. In order to manage the vagueness of their position, capitalists employed the Pressure-Compromise-Pressure (P-C-P) tactic to use Congress-led mass movements to secure colonial concessions while additionally offering the necessary financial patronage required to keep the organisational machinery of the INC afloat. This economic dependency allowed business elites notable policy leeway by which they were often successful in curbing the rise of labour radicalism, as is exemplified by the Bombay Trade Disputes Act 1938 and in stigmatising members of the leadership of the socialist radical movement. Finally, the article concludes that this co-evolutionary connection not only guided India towards a non-revolutionary route to independence but also set another milestone by defining the structure of independent, post-1947, state-sponsored, autonomous, capitalist development.

Comprador, Bourgeoise, Capitalist, Indian National Congress, Pressure -Compromise-Pressure

Neeraj Singh (2026); The Indian National Congress and the Capitalist Class: A Symbiotic Alliance or Comprador Capitalism?, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-12, Issue-7, Available on –   https://www.ijirmf.com/

1. Bagchi, A. K. (2008). Private Investment in India (1900-1939). Cambridge University Press.

2. Bhattacharya, S. (1976). Cotton Mills and Spinning Wheels: Swadeshi and the Indian Capitalist Class, 1920-22. Economic and Political Weekly, 11(47), 1828-1834.

3. Bhattacharya, S. (1981). Capital and Labour in Bombay City, 1928-29. Economic and Political Weekly, 16(42/43), 36-44.

4. Chandra, B. (1979). Nationalism and Colonialism in Modern India. Orient Longman.

5. Chakrabarti, M. (2009). Why Did Indian Big Business Pursue a Policy of Economic Nationalism in the Interwar Years? A New Window to an Old Debate. Modern Asian Studies, 43(4), 979-1038.

6. Ghosh, S. (1988). Indian Bourgeoisie and Imperialism. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(45/47), 2445-2558.

7. Markovits, C. (1981). Indian Business and the Congress Provincial Governments 1937-39. Modern Asian Studies, 15(3), 487-526.

8. Markovits, C. (2002). Indian Business and Nationalist Politics 1931–1939: The Indigenous Capitalist Class and the Rise of the Congress Party. Cambridge University Press.

9. Mukherjee, A., & Mukherjee, M. (1988). Imperialism and the Growth of Indian Capitalism in the Twentieth Century. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(11), 531–546.

10. Mukherjee, A. (2002). Imperialism, Nationalism and the Making of the Indian Capitalist Class, 1920-1947. Sage Publications.

 

 


Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads:3 | No. of Views: 15