Navigating the Complexities of Public-Private Partnerships: A Critical Analysis of BOT and HAM Frameworks in the Indian Road Sector
Author(s): 1. Vigneshlinga, 2. Dr. G. KUMARAN
Authors Affiliations:
1Research Scholar, Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, TN-India.
2Professor & Head, Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, TN-India.
DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202609004 | Paper ID: IJIRMF202609004
This article critically compares the structural and operational flaws of the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT-Toll) and Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) frameworks in India’s highway sector. Using the Institutional Risk Allocation Perspective, the study illustrates how misaligned risk transfer causes systemic project distress. The legacy BOT model collapsed because it forced private developers to absorb uncontrollable macroeconomic demand risks, ultimately triggering banking sector distress. While the subsequent HAM framework resolved this by insulating developers from revenue volatility, it inadvertently replaced macroeconomic risk with micro-bureaucratic friction. Rigid milestone-linked disbursements and persistent land constraints now create severe working capital bottlenecks. Furthermore, HAM’s financial de-risking dilutes the developer's "skin-in-the-game," threatening long-term asset quality. To ensure sustainable infrastructure financing, this paper recommends dynamically adjusting equity requirements based on technical capability and implementing technology-driven oversight to eliminate administrative delays.
Vigneshlinga, Dr. G. Kumaran (2026); Navigating the Complexities of Public-Private Partnerships: A Critical Analysis of BOT and HAM Frameworks in the Indian Road Sector, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-12, Issue-9, Available on – https://www.ijirmf.com/
[1] Cherkos, F. D., Jha, K. N., & Singh, A. (2020). Framework to select public–private partnership modalities. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000425
[2] Patil, N. A., & Laishram, B. (2016). Public-private partnerships from sustainability perspective – a critical analysis of the Indian case. International Journal of Construction Management, 16(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1146113
[3] Jagannathan, M. (2016). Public private partnerships in India: Problems and solutions. In Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies (pp. 84-93). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482025.052
[4] Thomas, A. V., Kalidindi, S. N., & Ganesh, L. S. (2006). Modelling and assessment of critical risks in BOT road projects. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500435275
[5] Prasad, K. V., Vasugi, V., Venkatesan, R., & Bhat, N. S. (2019). Critical causes of time overrun in Indian construction projects and mitigation measures. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 15(3), 216-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2018.1499569
[6] Devkar, G., Palliyaguru, R., & Oyegoke, A. S. (2020). The effects of institutional frameworks on implementation of PPP projects: A comparative perspective in Australia and India. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(6), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1769255
[7] Dhanshyam, M., & Srivastava, S. K. (2021). Governance structures for public infrastructure projects: Public–private management regimes, contractual forms and innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 39(8), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1938162
[8] Koirala, S. (2024). Hybrid Annuity Model: Implications in Nepalese Highways. Samsad Journal संसद जर्नल, 1(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.3126/sj.v1i1.75904
[9] Deep, S., Singh, S., Jha, K.N., Uggina, V.S., & Vishnoi, S. (2024). Critical challenges in execution of hybrid annuity model construction projects: Understanding the contractor’s perspective. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2395
[10] Deep, S., Bhoola, V., Vidhani, J., & Hampannaver, P. R. (2022). Evaluating the impact of constraints on project success: Empirical study of highway projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(4), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2021-0074
[11] Casady, C. B., & Peci, F. (2021). The institutional challenges of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in transition economies: lessons from Kosovo. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1949–1965. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860791
[12] Sehgal, R., & Dubey, A. M. (2019). Identification of critical success factors for public–private partnership projects. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1956
[13] Rajan, T. A., Gopinath, G., & Behera, M. (2014). PPPs and project overruns: Evidence from road projects in India. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000797
[14] Akhtar, M., Mufti, N. A., Mubin, S., Saleem, M. Q., Zahoor, S., & Ullah, S. (2023). Identification of various execution modes and their respective risks for public–private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects. Buildings, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081889