30, April 2025

A Comprehensive Review of Effective Strategies for Designing E-Content for Undergraduate Education

VOLUME-11; ISSUE-4; APR-2025

Author(s): 1. Suchitra Singh, 2. Aarti Singh, 3. Sanghamitra Mohapatra

Authors Affiliations:

  1. Research Scholar, Ethelind College of Community Science, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India; 2. Assistant Professor, Ethelind College of Community Science, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3. Professor, Ethelind College of Community Science, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202504059     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202504059


Abstract
Keywords
Cite this Article/Paper as
References

The rapid advancement of technology has ushered in a new era of education, where e-content plays a pivotal role in enhancing undergraduate learning experiences. This comprehensive review paper delves into the strategies that effectively shape the design of e-content for undergraduate education. The paper explores a range of pedagogical approaches that underpin e-content design, including constructivism, active learning, and flipped classrooms. User-centered design principles are examined, emphasizing the significance of accommodating diverse learning styles and preferences. The integration of multimedia and interactive elements, as well as the utilization of gamification and motivational strategies, are explored for their impact on engagement and learning outcomes. The review also underscores the importance of inclusivity, accessibility, and personalized learning in e-content design. Additionally, the paper delves into assessment and feedback strategies, presents case studies exemplifying successful e-content implementations, and discusses emerging technologies that hold the potential to revolutionize e-content design in the future. Challenges and considerations related to technical constraints and faculty training are also addressed. This review serves as a comprehensive guide for educators, instructional designers, and institutions seeking to optimize e-content for undergraduate education.

E-content design for undergraduate students, User-Centered Design Principles, Gamification and Motivational Strategies, Adaptive E-Content.

Suchitra Singh,  Aarti Singh, A Comprehensive Review of Effective Strategies for Designing E-Content for Undergraduate Education,   Sanghamitra Mohapatra (2025); International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-11, Issue-4, Pp.412-419.          Available on –   https://www.ijirmf.com/

  1. Aljaraideh, Y.; and Al Bataineh, K. (2019). Jordanian students’ barriers of utilizing online learning: Asurvey study. International Education Studies, 12(5), 99–108.
  2. Al Rawashdeh, A.Z.; Mohammed, E.Y.; Al Arab, A.R.; Alara, M.; and Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 19(3), 107-117.
  3. Altay, B. (2014). User-centered design through learner-centered instruction. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(2), 138-155.
  4. Barsan, G.; Năstăsescu, V.; and Barsan, V.A. (2017). Simulation and Gamification in e-Learning Technical Courses. Knowledge-Based Organization Conference Proceedings, 23(3):7-11.
  5. Baruah, B.; Prakash, S.; Lal, S.P.; and Pooja, G.S. (2023). Effectiveness of ICT-based Agro-met Advisory Services in Addressing the Information Needs of Farmers in Assam. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 23(2):108-112.
  6. Bele, J.L.; Bele, D.; and Debevc, M. (2016). Gamification as a method for increasing e-learning motivation. In ICERI2016 Proceedings, 5227-5235.
  7. Bojan, L.; and Bentz, D. (2020). Student perception of stress in online and face-to-face learning: The exploration of stress determinants. American Journal of Distance Education.
  8. Choi, C.; and Jeong, H. (2019). Quality evaluation for multimedia contents of e-learning systems using the ANP approach on high speed network. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(1), 28853-28875.
  9. Choudhury, P.K.; and Kumar, A. (2022). How much do Households Spend on Professional Higher Education in India? Results from a National Survey. Indian Journal of Human Development, 16(1), 77–96.
  10. De Paepe, L.; Zhu, C.; and Depryck, K. (2018). Online Language Teaching: Teacher Perceptions of Effective Communication Tools, Required Skills and Challenges of Online Teaching. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(1), 129-142.
  11. Devi, G.P.; and Sornapudi, S.D. (2022). An Analysis of Social Network Activities of College Students. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(1):92-96.
  12. Dumford, A.D.; and Miller, A.L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452-465.
  13. Dwivedi, K.D.; Upadhyay, M.S.; and Tripathi, A. (2012). A working framework for the user-centered design approach and a survey of the available methods. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(4), 12-19.
  14. El-Sabagh, H.A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-24.
  15. Fitria, T.N.; Simbolon, N.E.; and Afdaleni, A. (2023). Chatbots as Online Chat Conversation in the Education Sector. International Journal of Computer and Information System (IJCIS), 4(3), 93-104.
  16. Gao, P.; Li, J.; and Liu, S. (2021). An Introduction to Key Technology in Artificial Intelligence and big Data Driven e-Learning and e-Education. Mobile Netw Appl, 26:2123-2126.
  17. Gattullo, M.; Laviola, E.; Boccaccio, A.; Evangelista, A.; Fiorentino, M.; Manghisi, V.M.; and Uva, A.E. (2022). Design of a mixed reality application for STEM distance education laboratories. Computers, 11(4), 50-57.
  18. Gautam, S.S.; and Tiwari, M.K. (2016). Components and benefits of e-learning system. International Research Journal of Computer Science (IRJCS), 3(1), 14-17.
  19. Ghosh, S.; and Kundu, A. (2021). Women’s Participation in Higher Education in India: An Analysis Across Major States. Indian Journal of Human Development, 15(2), 275-294.
  20. Huang, Y.M.; and Chiu, P.S. (2015). The effectiveness of a meaningful learning‐based evaluation model for context‐aware mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 437-447.
  21. Islam, N.; Beer, M.; and Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102-112.
  22. Kebritchi, M.; Lipschuetz, A.; and Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
  23. Kovalenko, V.; Marienko, M.; and Sukhikh, A. (2022). Use of augmented and virtual reality tools in a general secondary education institution in the context of blended learning. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 86(6):e2201.07003.
  24. Martínez-Caro, E.; Cegarra-Navarro, J. G.; and Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2015). An application of the performance-evaluation model for e-learning quality in higher education. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 26(5-6), 632-647.
  25. Mehrabi, M. (2019). Setting up the structure and process for E-content development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 10(4), 78-80.
  26. Meinam, M.; Singh, Y.J.; Upadhyay, A.D.; Thangave, V.; Deepti, M.; and Meinam T. (2023). Students’ Perception Towards e-Learning in Manipur. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 23(1):51-54.
  27. Nanda, S.M.; Goswami, A.; and Biswas, S. (2022). Development of Cognitive Learning Scale to Test the Knowledge Level of Veterinary Students on ICT. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(1): 142-145.
  28. Olasina, G. (2019). Human and social factors affecting the decision of students to accept e-learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 363-376.
  29. Pandit, J.M.; and Paul, B. (2021). Can India’s Higher Education Improve Through Better Management of Human Resources: A Comparative Study of India and the United States. Indian Journal of Human Development, 15(3), 468-485.
  30. Phanisha, G.; Babu, K.M.; Rani, V.S.; and Vidyasagar, G.E.C. (2022). Knowledge of the Extension Personnel on Tech-Enabled Platforms (TEP) in Telangana. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(2): 106-112.
  31. Rahrouh, M.; Taleb, N.; and Mohamed, E.A. (2018). Evaluating the usefulness of e-learning management system delivery in higher education. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 16(2), 162-181.
  32. Raju, D. T.; Ramesh, P.; Sharma, S.; Krishnan, P.; Yashavanth, B.S.; Soam, S.K.; and Srinivasarao, C. (2023). Students’ Perceptions on the Effect of COVID 19 on Agricultural Higher Education in India. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 23(1):6-16.
  33. Rashid, S.; and Yadav, S.S. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Higher Education and Research. Indian Journal of Human Development, 14(2), 340–343.
  34. Salloum, S.A.; Al-Emran, M.; Shaalan, K.; and Tarhini, A. (2019). Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 509–530.
  35. Samsuri, N.N.; Nadzri, F.A.; and Rom, K.B.M. (2014). A Study on the student’s perspective on the effectiveness of using e-learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 123, 139-144.
  36. Sihas, K.M.M.; and Nair, L.V. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on the Education of Adivasi Communities in Kerala. Indian Journal of Human Development, 16(1), 186–193.
  37. Soam, S.K.; Raghupathi, B.; Sharma, S.;Yashavanth, B.S.; Balakrishnan, M.; Rao,S.N.; Raju, D.T.; Kumar P.; and Agrawal, R.C. (2022). Mind Mapping as a Learning and Teaching Tool in Agricultural Higher Education in India. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(3): 176-181.
  38. Yadav, K.; Kumari, P.; and Lal, S.P. (2023). Effectiveness of Teaching Methods on Students in Formal Education during COVID-19 in India: An Experimental Research. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 23(3), 71-75.
Post Views: 66

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads:20 | No. of Views: 61