A Study on Investors Perception and Attitude Towards Socially Responsible Investment
Author(s): Miss. Sunitarani Behera, Mr. Krushnakanta Sahu
Authors Affiliations:
1. M.Com, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack; 2. PhD Scholar, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar
DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202509013     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202509013Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) has emerged as a prominent strategy for investors seeking to align financial objectives with ethical, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations. Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) means investing in companies, organisations, or funds that not only provide financial returns but also strategies involve choosing companies that prioritize social justice, ethical beliefs, environmental sustainability and corporate responsibility. In other words, it is an investment strategy that balance financial profit with positive social impact. Despite the increasing popularity of SRI, its market performance remains a subject of debate. Some studies suggest that socially responsible investments can match or even outperform conventional portfolios due to strong corporate governance, risk mitigation, and long-term sustainability factors. However, others argue that restricting investments based on ethical considerations may limit diversification and lead to lower returns. This study aims to explore the financial performance of SRI compared to traditional investment strategies, examining key factors that influence returns, risk profiles, and investor behavior. In addition, this paper tries to have a deeper insight into Indian investors’ awareness level and behaviours toward SRI.
Miss. Sunitarani Behera, Mr. Krushnakanta Sahu (2025); A Study on Investors Perception and Attitude Towards Socially Responsible Investment, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-11, Issue-9, Pp.101-105.     Available on –  https://www.ijirmf.com/
1. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.
2. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–322.
3.Bollen, N. P. B. (2007). Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3), 683–708. Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
4.Nilsson, J. (2008). Investment with a conscience: Examining the impact of pro-social attitudes and perceived financial performance on socially responsible investment behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 307–325.
5. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.
6. Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: new evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124.
7. Benson, K., & Humphrey, J. E. (2008). Socially responsible investment funds: Investor reaction to current and past returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1850–1859.
8. Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66.
9. Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65, 33–46.
10. Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13(5), 908–922.
11. Geczy, C., Stambaugh, F., & Levin, D. (2005). Investing in socially responsible mutual funds. [Working Paper].
12. Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48(C), 180–193.