29, December 2025

Availability and Accessibility Assessment of the Public Transit System in Jaipur City

Author(s): 1 Ar. Jainik Jayeshkumar Rana, 2 Hardik T. Sandish,

Authors Affiliations:

1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Design and Planning, Bhagwan Mahavir University, Surat -395007, India

2 Asst. Professor, Department of Design and Planning, Bhagwan Mahavir University, Surat -395007, India

DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202512026     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202512026


Abstract
Keywords
Cite this Article/Paper as
References

Efficient and equitable public transportation is a cornerstone of sustainable urban development in rapidly growing Indian cities. Jaipur, the capital of Rajasthan, has experienced significant demographic expansion and motorization over the past two decades, placing substantial pressure on its transport networks. This study evaluates the availability and accessibility of Jaipur’s public transit system using a mixed-methods approach that integrates Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Public Transport Accessibility Levels (PTAL), pedestrian infrastructure audits, and commuter satisfaction surveys. Findings indicate pronounced spatial disparities: central zones demonstrate high stop density (4–6 stops/km²), frequent bus services (10–15 minutes), and PTAL values between 4 and 6, while peripheral zones remain underserved with low stop density (0.5–1.5 stops/km²), infrequent services (30–45 minutes), and PTAL scores of 0–2. Pedestrian accessibility further limits effective transit reach, with 80% of roads lacking continuous footpaths and only 18% of intersections offering safe pedestrian crossings. Survey responses (n=820) identify low frequency, long walking distances, overcrowding, and safety concerns—particularly among women—as major deterrents to transit use. Recommendations include targeted route expansion, pedestrian corridor upgrades, feeder integration with metro stations, transit-oriented development (TOD) zoning, and safety-oriented service improvements. Implementing these measures can increase Jaipur’s average PTAL from 2.3 to 3.2, double daily transit ridership to 2.5 million by 2035, reduce underserved populations from 35% to under 10%, and contribute to substantial emission reductions. The paper concludes with a strategic, phased implementation framework aligned with sustainable urban mobility goals.

Public transit, Accessibility, Availability, PTAL, GIS, Urban mobility, Transit-oriented development

1 Ar. Jainik Jayeshkumar Rana, 2 Hardik T. Sandish, (2025); Availability and Accessibility Assessment of the Public Transit System in Jaipur City, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-11, Issue-12, Pp. 184-189.         Available on –   https://www.ijirmf.com/

  1. Asian Development Bank. (2017). Jaipur Metro Rail Line 1-Phase B Project. Project Report 46417-001.
  2. Cervero, R., & Dai, D. (2014). BRT TOD: Leveraging transit-oriented development with bus rapid transit investments. Transport Policy, 58, 133–147.
  3. Gahlot, V., Swami, B. L., Parida, M., & Kalla, P. (2013). Availability and accessibility assessment of public transit system in Jaipur City. International Journal for Transportation Engineering, 1, 81–91.
  4. Indian Institute of Public Health. (2022). Air quality and transportation health impacts in Indian cities. IIPH.
  5. Jaipur City Transport Services Limited. (2024). Annual operations report and fleet data. JCTSL.
  6. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2023). PMAY-U Transit Integration Guidelines. Government of India.
  7. Rajasthan Transport Department. (2023). Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Jaipur. Government of Rajasthan.
  8. Shrivastava, P. (2025). Assessing public transport accessibility: A case of Jaipur (M.Plan thesis). School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal.
  9. United Nations Habitat. (2024). Sustainable City Strategy: Jaipur. UN-Habitat India.
  10. World Bank. (2019). Urban India: Status of Indian Metropolitan Regions. The World Bank Group.

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads:5 | No. of Views: 51