Custodial violence & police accountability in India: a critical study of institutional failures and judicial trends
Author(s): 1. Mr. Yash Choudhary, 2. Mrs. Reecha Parakh
Authors Affiliations:
Author & Student of L.L.M. 2nd year, Govt. State Level P.G. Law College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
2 Guide & Assistant Professor of Law, Govt. State Level P.G. Law College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202608013     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202608013Custodial violence continues to be a serious issue in the Indian criminal justice system despite constitutional protections under Articles 20 and 21. Incidents of torture, abuse, and custodial deaths reflect weaknesses in enforcement, police accountability, and institutional oversight. This study examines the legal framework, judicial interventions, and causes of custodial violence, including political interference, weak safeguards, and police impunity. It analyses important laws, constitutional provisions, and landmark judgments such as D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal and Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, which strengthened procedural safeguards and state accountability. The study concludes that although the judiciary has played an important role in protecting custodial rights, effective implementation of reforms and stronger accountability mechanisms are still urgently needed.
Mr. Yash Choudhary, Mrs. Reecha Parakh (2026); Custodial violence & police accountability in India: a critical study of institutional failures and judicial trends, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-12, Issue-8, Available on – https://www.ijirmf.com/
- Vijaya Sampat Anandi Jagtap, ―The Police Their Deviances with Special Reference to Some of the Crimes, University, 2010, https://ijlr.iledu.in/police-deviance-structures-of-legal-restraint-on-police-fowers-in-india/
- Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India on 25 January, 1978, ‖ accessed October 11, 2024, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1766147/
- Law Commission of India | India, https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101-169/Report152.pdf
- India: Death penalty for nine police officers will not end custodial torture in India – Amnesty International https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/04/india-death-penalty-for-nine-police-officers-will-not-end-custodial-torture-in-india/
- Section 7 of The Police Act, 1861, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1856099/
- Section 29 of The Police Act, 1861, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/380997/
- C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India AIR 1996 SC 484, https://catjudgements.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/74953/1/180410020112017_1.pdf
- Prakash Singh & Ors vs Union of India and Ors (2006) 8 SCC 1, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1090328/
- Section 11, 32 and 39 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
- Police accountability in India by Gautam Joshi SB Nangia APH Publishing Corporation 2007 EDITION
- Abhidhvaj Law Journal, ―IS THERE A NEED TO RESTRAIN POLICE OFFICERS TO USE FORCE? Abhidhvaj Law Journal, March 30, 2024, https://www.abhidhvajlawjournal.com/blog-by-abhidhvaj-law-journal- 2/
- See Generally: Chaturvedi, A (2017). Police Reforms in India. Available at: https://www.prsindia.org/sites/default/files/parliament_or_policy_pdfs/Police%20Reforms%20in%20India.pdf [Accessed Date: 4th October,2020]
- The Government has reviewed the Model Police Act, 2006 and accordingly, a draft Model Police Bill, 2015 has been prepared and placed on the website of BPR&D. Further, as “Police” is a state subject, falling in List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, it is primarily the responsibility of the State Governments to formulate new Police Act or amend their existing Act on the lines of draft Model Police Bill prepared by the Central Government.
- BIPAN CHANDRA, INDIA’S STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE 1857-1947, Penguin Books, 1-10, https://ia801806.us.archive.org/17/items/indias-struggle-for-independence-bipan-chandra/India%27s%20Struggle%20for%20Independence%20-%20Bipan%20Chandra.pdf
- Evolution of Police in India,‖ SlideShare, January 15, 2022, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/evolution- of-police-in India/251000582.
- Sube Singh vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 February, 2006 Writ Petition (crl.) 237 of 1998, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/785041/
- Inderjeet v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 13 SCC 584, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/39691783/
- S. Puttaswamy vs. The Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127517806/
- Kharak Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1963 SC 1295 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/619152/
- Francis Coralie Mullin vs. The Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi (1981) 1 SCC 608, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/78536/
- Pram Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 526, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/853252/
- Custodial_Violence-_Research_Paper.pdf https://theadvocatesleague.in/assets/pdf/papers/Custodial_Violence-_Research_Paper.pdf
- Drishti IAS Coaching in Delhi, Online IAS Test Series & Study Material,‖ accessed October 11, 2024, https://www.drishtiias.com/printpdf/the-bigpicture-police-commissioner-system
- Charter of the United Nations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_the_United_Nations
- UN’s Universal declaration of human rights – article 5 concerning torture – MHHRI | Mental Health and Human Rights Info, https://www.hhri.org/publication/uns-universal-declaration-of-human-rights-article-5-concerning-torture/
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights | OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
- The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1984, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-against-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading
- United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules) | OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-standard-minimum-rules-non-custodial-measures
- K. Basu vs State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/501198/
- Nilabati Behera vs. State of Orissa (1993) 2 SCC 746
- Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1994) 4 SCC 260 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/768175/
- Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra (1983) 2 SCC 96
- Khatri (II) v. State of Bihar (1981) 1 SCC 627
- Raghubir Singh v. State of Haryana (1980) 3 SCC 70, https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609abebe4b014971140da4c
- Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978) 2 SCC 424https://www.alec.co.in/judgement-page/nandini-satpathy-v-pl-dani-air-1978-sc-1025#:~:text=(Landmark),claiming%20they%20were%20self%2Dincriminating.
- Vineet Narain vs Union of India (1998) 1 SCC 226, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1203995/
- Rudul Shah vs. State of Bihar (1983) 4 SCC 141
- Human Rights Act 1998, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1
- S. Constitution, Amendments VIII & XIV; 42 U.S.C. §1983, United States Code Annotated, p. 142., https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-title42/html/USCODE-2010-title42-chap21.htm
- Pratt, John, “Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess,” British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2008, p. 124., https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/48/2/119/422635?redirectedFrom=fulltext.

