30, August 2026

Custodial violence & police accountability in India: a critical study of institutional failures and judicial trends

Author(s): 1. Mr. Yash Choudhary, 2. Mrs. Reecha Parakh

Authors Affiliations:

Author & Student of L.L.M. 2nd year, Govt. State Level P.G. Law College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

2 Guide & Assistant Professor of Law, Govt. State Level P.G. Law College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202608013     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202608013


Abstract
Keywords
Cite this Article/Paper as
References

Custodial violence continues to be a serious issue in the Indian criminal justice system despite constitutional protections under Articles 20 and 21. Incidents of torture, abuse, and custodial deaths reflect weaknesses in enforcement, police accountability, and institutional oversight. This study examines the legal framework, judicial interventions, and causes of custodial violence, including political interference, weak safeguards, and police impunity. It analyses important laws, constitutional provisions, and landmark judgments such as D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal and Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, which strengthened procedural safeguards and state accountability. The study concludes that although the judiciary has played an important role in protecting custodial rights, effective implementation of reforms and stronger accountability mechanisms are still urgently needed.

Custodial violence, police accountability, custodial deaths, judicial intervention, police impunity, institutional oversight, torture.

Mr. Yash Choudhary,  Mrs. Reecha Parakh (2026); Custodial violence & police accountability in India: a critical study of institutional failures and judicial trends, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-12, Issue-8, Available on –   https://www.ijirmf.com/

  1. Vijaya Sampat Anandi Jagtap, ―The Police Their Deviances with Special Reference to Some of the Crimes, University, 2010, https://ijlr.iledu.in/police-deviance-structures-of-legal-restraint-on-police-fowers-in-india/
  2. Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India on 25 January, 1978, ‖ accessed October 11, 2024, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1766147/
  3. Law Commission of India | India, https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101-169/Report152.pdf
  4. India: Death penalty for nine police officers will not end custodial torture in India – Amnesty International https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/04/india-death-penalty-for-nine-police-officers-will-not-end-custodial-torture-in-india/
  5. Section 7 of The Police Act, 1861, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1856099/
  6. Section 29 of The Police Act, 1861, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/380997/
  7. C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India AIR 1996 SC 484, https://catjudgements.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/74953/1/180410020112017_1.pdf
  8. Prakash Singh & Ors vs Union of India and Ors (2006) 8 SCC 1, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1090328/
  9. Section 11, 32 and 39 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
  10. Police accountability in India by Gautam Joshi SB Nangia APH Publishing Corporation 2007 EDITION
  11. Abhidhvaj Law Journal, ―IS THERE A NEED TO RESTRAIN POLICE OFFICERS TO USE FORCE? Abhidhvaj Law Journal, March 30, 2024, https://www.abhidhvajlawjournal.com/blog-by-abhidhvaj-law-journal- 2/
  12. See Generally: Chaturvedi, A (2017). Police Reforms in India. Available at: https://www.prsindia.org/sites/default/files/parliament_or_policy_pdfs/Police%20Reforms%20in%20India.pdf [Accessed Date: 4th October,2020]
  13. The Government has reviewed the Model Police Act, 2006 and accordingly, a draft Model Police Bill, 2015 has been prepared and placed on the website of BPR&D. Further, as “Police” is a state subject, falling in List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, it is primarily the responsibility of the State Governments to formulate new Police Act or amend their existing Act on the lines of draft Model Police Bill prepared by the Central Government.
  14. BIPAN CHANDRA, INDIA’S STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE 1857-1947, Penguin Books, 1-10, https://ia801806.us.archive.org/17/items/indias-struggle-for-independence-bipan-chandra/India%27s%20Struggle%20for%20Independence%20-%20Bipan%20Chandra.pdf
  15. Evolution of Police in India,‖ SlideShare, January 15, 2022, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/evolution- of-police-in India/251000582.
  16. Sube Singh vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 February, 2006 Writ Petition (crl.)  237 of 1998, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/785041/
  17. Inderjeet v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 13 SCC 584, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/39691783/
  18. S. Puttaswamy vs. The Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127517806/
  19. Kharak Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1963 SC 1295 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/619152/
  20. Francis Coralie Mullin vs. The Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi (1981) 1 SCC 608, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/78536/
  21. Pram Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 526, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/853252/
  22. Custodial_Violence-_Research_Paper.pdf https://theadvocatesleague.in/assets/pdf/papers/Custodial_Violence-_Research_Paper.pdf
  23. Drishti IAS Coaching in Delhi, Online IAS Test Series & Study Material,‖ accessed October 11, 2024, https://www.drishtiias.com/printpdf/the-bigpicture-police-commissioner-system
  24. Charter of the United Nations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_the_United_Nations
  25. UN’s Universal declaration of human rights – article 5 concerning torture – MHHRI | Mental Health and Human Rights Info, https://www.hhri.org/publication/uns-universal-declaration-of-human-rights-article-5-concerning-torture/
  26. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights | OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
  27. The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1984, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-against-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading
  28. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules) | OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-standard-minimum-rules-non-custodial-measures
  29. K. Basu vs State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/501198/
  30. Nilabati Behera vs. State of Orissa (1993) 2 SCC 746
  31. Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1994) 4 SCC 260 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/768175/
  32. Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra (1983) 2 SCC 96
  33. Khatri (II) v. State of Bihar (1981) 1 SCC 627
  34. Raghubir Singh v. State of Haryana (1980) 3 SCC 70, https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609abebe4b014971140da4c
  35. Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (1978) 2 SCC 424https://www.alec.co.in/judgement-page/nandini-satpathy-v-pl-dani-air-1978-sc-1025#:~:text=(Landmark),claiming%20they%20were%20self%2Dincriminating.
  36. Vineet Narain vs Union of India (1998) 1 SCC 226, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1203995/
  37. Rudul Shah vs. State of Bihar (1983) 4 SCC 141
  38. Human Rights Act 1998, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1
  39. S. Constitution, Amendments VIII & XIV; 42 U.S.C. §1983, United States Code Annotated, p. 142., https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-title42/html/USCODE-2010-title42-chap21.htm
  40. Pratt, John, “Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess,” British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2008, p. 124., https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/48/2/119/422635?redirectedFrom=fulltext.

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads:8 | No. of Views: 20