29, December 2025

Physics and Physical Principles Involved in Carbon Sequestration and Relative Scientific Practices: A review.

VOLUME-11; ISSUE-12; DEC-2025

Author(s): 1. Sreedevi Nimishakavi, 2. A. K. Singh, 3. Naga Aishwarya Tallapragada, 4. Ashok Gellu

Authors Affiliations:

1Assistant Professor, Department of Physics, Avanthi Institute of Engineering & Technology, Gunthapalli, Abdullapurmet, Telangana, India – 501512.

2Retired Scientist (DMRL), and Professor, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Science and Technology, Gandipet, R. R. District, Telangana, India – 500075.

3Department of Dental Sciences, Dentist, Spelmansgatan17b, Kristinehamn, Sweden 68131

4Assistant Professor (P), Department of Environmental Science, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Open University, Hyderabad.

DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202512017     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202512017


Abstract
Keywords
Cite this Article/Paper as
References

Abstract: Physics provides the fundamental understanding and tools that are necessary to develop, optimize, and monitor sustainable materials and processes for effective carbon sequestration. An attempt has been made in the present work to throw some light on leveraging physics principles to capture CO₂ from concentrated sources, utilizing waste energy, and optimizing processes with computational modelling. Incidentally, it offers the most promising pathways for cost-efficient carbon sequestration.

Carbon Sequestration, Modelling, Sustainable Materials, Physics Priciples, Cost - Efficient

Sreedevi Nimishakavi, A. K. Singh,  Naga Aishwarya Tallapragada,  Ashok Gellu (2025); Physics and Physical Principles Involved in Carbon Sequestration and Relative Scientific Practices: A Review., International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-11, Issue-12, Pp. 129-133.         Available on –   https://www.ijirmf.com/

References:

  1. Srinu Nagireddi et al. (2023): Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects for Global Decarbonization. ACS publications, 4 (1).
  2. K. Biswas et al. (2023): Carbon and cellulose-based nanofiller reinforcement to strengthen carbon fiber-epoxy composites: Processing, characterizations, and applications. Front Mater., 9, 10.3389.
  3. Xiao et al. (2021): Review of recent developments in cement composites reinforced with fibers and nanomaterials. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 15.
  4. Ajab Shir and R. Gupta (2024): Effects of pretreatment methods and physical properties of cellulose fibers on compatibility of fiber-cement composites: a review. Smart & Sustainable Infrastructure: Building a Greener Tomorrow, Springer Nature, pp. 253-264.
  5. Prabhugouda Patil and Dr. A. Kiran Kumar 2017: Biological carbon sequestration through fruit crops (perennial crops—natural “sponges” for absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere). Plant Archives 17 (2), pp. 1041-1046.
  6. Enobong Hanson et al. (2025): Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies: Evaluating the effectiveness of advanced CCUS solutions for reducing CO₂ emissions. Journal of Results in Surfaces and Interfaces. 18, 100381.
  7. Rohit Shaw and Soumyajit Mukherjee (2022): The development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India: A critical review. Carbon Capture Science & Technology. 2, 100036.
  8. Jaime S. King et al., In This Together: International Collaborations for Environmental and Human Health. PMCID: PMC10881263 PMID: 37655569.
  9. Bressler, R. Daniel (2021): “The Mortality Cost of Carbon.” Nature Communications 12 (1).
  10. Gardiner S (2004): “The Global Warming Tragedy and the Dangerous Illusion of the Kyoto Protocol.” Ethics and Intergenerational Affairs, 18, 23–39.
  11. Paris Agreement, article 9, supra note 4. As part of the Paris Agreement, developed countries were urged to scale up their level of support with a concrete roadmap to achieve the goal of mobilizing US$100 billion per year by 2020 for climate action in developing countries.
  12. Kailun Chen et al. (2024): Carbon sequestration, performance optimization, and environmental impact assessment of functional materials in cementitious composites. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 90, 102986.
  13. Kumar, A., et al. (2004): Reservoir Simulation of CO₂ Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers. In Proceedings of the DOE 14th Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, USA, 17–21.
  14. Doranehgard, M.H., and Dehghanpour, H. (2020). Quantification of convective and diffusive transport during CO₂ dissolution in oil: A numerical and analytical study. Phys. Fluids, 32, 085110.
  15. Taha Rabea El‑Qalamosh et al. (2023): A multi‑disciplinary approach for trap identification in the Southern Meleiha Area, North Western Desert, Egypt: integrating seismic, well log, and fault seal analysis. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ., Geo-resour., 9
  16. Sreedevi N et al. (2024): A review on the impact of sustainable materials for environmental remediation. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Science without Borders: A Multidisciplinary Vision for the Future. Book chapter, 94-104, ISBN: 978-93-49022-03-4.
  17. Yang, H.S., and Kim, N.S. (1996): Determination of rock properties by accelerated neural network. In Proceedings of the 2nd North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, Montréal, QC, Canada, 19–21, 1567–1572.
  18. Rami Eid et al. (2015): Seismic monitoring of CO₂ plume growth, evolution, and migration in a heterogeneous reservoir: Role, impact, and importance of patchy saturation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 43, 70-81.
  19. Doughty, C. (2010): Investigation of CO₂ Plume Behavior for a Large-Scale Pilot Test of Geologic Carbon Storage in a Saline Formation. Transp. Porous Media, 82, 49–76.
  20. https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.46690/ager.2025.03.07
  21. Kailun Chen et al. (2024): Carbon sequestration, performance optimization, and environmental impact assessment of functional materials in cementitious composites. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 90
  22. Davarpanah et al. (2020): CO₂ capture on natural zeolite clinoptilolite: effect of temperature and role of the adsorption sites. J. Environ. Manag., 275, 111229.
  23. Susana Valencia (2021): Molecules. Zeolitic Microporous Materials and Their Applications. 26 (3) 730.
  24. Xingyuan Gao et al. (2022): Carbonaceous materials as adsorbents for CO₂ capture: synthesis and modification. Carbon Capture Science & Technology. 3, 100039.
  25. S. González et al. (2013): Sustainable biomass-based carbon adsorbents for post-combustion CO₂ capture. Chem. Eng. J.
  26. Huang et al. (2011): Carbonation curing for wollastonite-Portland cementitious materials: CO₂ sequestration potential and feasibility assessment. J. Clean. Prod., 211, pp. 830-841.
  27. Muhammad Tawalbeh et al. (2025): Artificial intelligence and material design in carbon capture and utilization: A review of emerging synergies. Carbon Capture Science & Technology. 16
  28. Kazim et al. (2023): Artificial intelligence application in membrane processes and prediction of fouling for better resource recovery. J. Resour. Recover, 1
  29. Ali Saeedi (2012): Experimental Study of Multiphase Flow in Porous Media during CO₂ Geo-Sequestration Processes, 40-48, ISBN: 978-3-642-25040-8.
  30. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017609
  31. Quentin Grafton et al. (2021): A global analysis of the cost-efficiency of forest carbon sequestration. 185. DOI:10.1787/e4d45973-en
  32. Muhammad Imran Rashid et al. (2023): Developments in mineral carbonation for carbon sequestration. Heliyon, 9 (11), e21796.
  33. De Gruyter (2025): Applications of physics-informed neural networks in geosciences: From basic seismology to comprehensive environmental studies. Open Geosciences, 202517(1), DOI:10.1515/geo-2025-0853.
  34. Maryana Emad Helmi et al. (2025): Unlocking the potential of CO₂ storage in saline aquifers: Challenges, knowledge gaps, and future directions for large-scale storage. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 16

 

Post Views: 93

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads:5 | No. of Views: 65