25, September 2025

The Intertextual Reconsideration: The Text, an Intertextual Reader, and the Social Function of the Author

Author(s): 1. Shikha Juyal, 2. Dr. Harleen Kaur

Authors Affiliations:

  1. Research Scholar/ School of Liberal Arts/ Uttaranchal University/ Uttarakhand/ Dehradun, India
  2. Assistant Professor (senior grade)/ Department of Humanities and Social Sciences/ JIIT/ Noida/Uttar Pradesh, India

DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202509008     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202509008


Abstract
Keywords
Cite this Article/Paper as
References

Intertextuality gained momentum in the late 1960s, with its founder, Julia Kristeva, claiming that a literary text was a conglomeration of various texts embedded in its structural fabric. Since then, it has become a colossal term with its widespread currency among the international academia and literary theorists, and critics. This paper is an effort to build a comprehensive view to understand intertextuality in conjunction with the social function of the author, and the role of an intertextual reader, and literary text. The stance of intertextuality challenges the author-centric notions of authority while increasing the visibility and position of the reader. The biggest question is whether a reader can comprehend the potential meaning. While an ongoing debate of hermeneutics paradox, this article delves into highlighting a balanced position of the author-text-reader dynamics from a socio-cultural perspective. Another issue this paper discusses is a more balanced author position.

Intertextuality, Comprehensive, Reader, Author, Literary Text, Socio-cultural perspective

Shikha Juyal, Dr. Harleen Kaur  (2025); The Intertextual Reconsideration: The Text, an Intertextual Reader, and the Social Function of the Author, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-11, Issue-9, Pp.59-67.          Available on –   https://www.ijirmf.com/

  1. Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ed, and trans. Caryl Emerson. Intro. Wayne C. Booth, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,1984. 7-24.
  2. McAfee, Noelle. Julia Kristeva. London: Routledge, 2015. Print.
  3. Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Edited by Leon S. Roudiez, translated by Thomas Gora, Alice A. Jardine, and Leon S, Roudiez, Columbia UP, 1980. Print.
  4. Williamson, Eugene. “Plato’s ‘Eidos’ and the Archetypes of Jung and Frye.” Interpretations 1 (1985) Print.
  5. Culler, Jonathan. “Presupposition and Intertextuality.” MLN, vol. 91, no. 6,1976, p. 1395. Print.
  6. Bloom, Harold. Poetry and Repression: Revisionism from Blake to Stevens. Yale UP, 1976. Print.
  7. Ott, Brian L., and Cameron Walter. “Intertextuality: Interpretive Practice and Textual Strategy.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 17 (2000): 429-453. Print.
  8. Hartman, Douglas K. “Intertextuality and Reading: The Text, the Reader, the Author, and the Context.” Linguistics and Education 4 (1992): 295-311. Print.
  9. Barthes, Roland. Image-Music-Text. Translated by Stephen Heath, London: Fontana, 1997. Print.
  10. Foucault, Michel. “What is an Author?” Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. Edited by James D. Faubion, translated by Robert Hurley et al., vol. 2, The New Press, 1998, pp. 205-222. Print.
  11. Berta, Mario et al., “The ‘Alter Ego’ in Psychiatry,” The Lancet 354, no, SIV55.1. Print.
  12. Iser, Wolfgang. “Interaction Between Text and Reader.” The reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Edited by Susan Rubin Suleiman and Inge Crossman, Princeton UP, 1980, pp. 106-119. Print.
  13. Rosenblatt, Louise M. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Southern Illinois UP, 1994. Print.
  14. Eco, Umberto. The Role of the Reader. Indiana UP, 1981. Print.

 

 

 

 


Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads:2 | No. of Views: 19