25, April 2026

Multidimensional Science Teaching: An Anekantavada-Based Pedagogical Model

VOLUME-12; ISSUE-4; APR-2026

Author(s): 1 Miss. Sweta Amrutlal Dabhi, 2 Prof. (Dr.) Alkaben J Macwan,

Authors Affiliations:

1 Research Scholar, Department of Education, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, India

2Professor, Department of Education, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, India

DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202604015     |     Paper ID: IJIRMF202604015


Abstract
Keywords
Cite this Article/Paper as
References

In an era where science education is paramount for nurturing critical thinking and informed decision-making, integrating the ancient philosophy of Anekantvaad, or non-absolutism, offers a novel pedagogic model. This paper explores the seamless integration of Anekantvaad principles with the teaching of science at the secondary school level. Anekantvaad, rooted in Jainism, advocates for multiple perspectives and the relativity of truth through its core principles: Syadvada, Nayavada, and Saptabhanginaya. This integration addresses the challenges of teaching complex scientific concepts and equips students with cognitive tools to comprehend the multifaceted nature of scientific truths.

The cognitive benefits encompass improved comprehension of complex concepts and the development of critical thinking skills. Socially and ethically, students gain empathy and respect for diverse opinions, nurturing them as global citizens. Long-term impacts include fostering a foundation for lifelong learning and the potential application of open-mindedness in various fields.

Challenges in implementation, such as reconciling open-ended philosophies with standardized assessments and overcoming resistance from traditional teaching methods, are discussed. Teacher training, leadership support, and tailored assessment approaches are proposed solutions.

An example lesson plan for teaching force through Anekantavada principles is provided. Future directions include longitudinal studies on the model's effectiveness, adaptations for different age groups and cultures, and integration into other subjects. Finally, the paper underscores the responsibility of educators to nurture informed minds and compassionate hearts, urging the incorporation of Anekantvaad's principles to empower students for success in the dynamic 21st century.

 

Key Words:  Anekantvaad, science education, critical thinking, empathy, non-absolutism, pedagogic model, Jainism, Syadvada, Nayavada, Saptabhanginaya, teacher training, lifelong learning, global citizenship.

Anekantvaad, science education, critical thinking, empathy, non-absolutism, pedagogic model, Jainism, Syadvada, Nayavada, Saptabhanginaya, teacher training, lifelong learning, global citizenship.

Miss. Sweta Amrutlal Dabhi,  Prof. (Dr.) Alkaben J Macwan, (2026); Multidimensional Science Teaching: An Anekantavada-Based Pedagogical Model, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Vol-12, Issue-4, Available on –   https://www.ijirmf.com/

  1. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press.
  2. Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. BSCS.
  3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin.
  4. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
  5. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  6. Gandhi, L. (1987). Anekanta: The Third Eye. Motilal Banarsidass.
  7. Gray, J. A., & Bryce, T. G. (2006). Planning and Design for High Performance and Energy Efficiency. Architectural Press.
  8. Jaini, P. S. (1980). The Jaina Path of Purification. University of California Press.
  9. Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Assessment as a way of seeing: Negotiating validity in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 311-318.
  10. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Lipman, M., & Sharp, A. M. (2008). Growing Up with Philosophy: An Integrated Curriculum. Temple University Press.
  12. National Research Council. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academies Press.
  13. National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press.
  14. Noddings, N. (2012). The Maternal Factor: Two Paths to Morality. University of California Press.
  15. Nosich, G. M. (2008). Learning to Think Things Through: A Guide to Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum. Pearson.
  16. Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (2001). Toward an ecological perspective of learning: The impact of framing on the concept of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 701-722.
Post Views: 110

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads:15 | No. of Views: 90